Frankenstein by Mary Shelley

Frankenstein I’ve had this book on my list for the RIP challenge for the last four years and finally, this year, I found time to read it! This was technically a re-read for me as I know I read it in when I was in my teens, but I had almost completely forgotten the story so it did feel as though I was reading it for the first time again. I also think I was maybe a bit too young to fully appreciate it the first time (I remember skipping through the ‘boring’ parts at the beginning to get to the parts with the monster).

Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus was written while Mary Shelley and her husband, the poet Percy Bysshe Shelley, were staying at Lake Geneva with Lord Byron and John Polidori in the summer of 1816. Shelley’s novel is said to have come about as a result of a challenge from Byron that also led to Polidori’s The Vampyre (a story that influenced Bram Stoker’s Dracula) and the beginnings of Byron’s own unfinished vampire story.

Frankenstein begins with some letters written by Arctic explorer Robert Walton to his sister in which he describes his voyage to the North Pole and how he saw a huge figure crossing the ice in a sledge pulled by dogs. Soon after this, Walton and his companions rescue another man, who is frozen and exhausted. His name is Victor Frankenstein and he tells Walton that he was trying to catch up with the giant figure they saw earlier. What follows is Victor’s story, beginning with his childhood in Geneva and his early interest in chemistry and other sciences. At university, his study of science continues and he secretly begins the construction of a human-like being which he plans to bring to life.

Victor’s experiment is a success, but after his creature is brought to life he panics and runs away, leaving the monster alone to fend for itself. The rest of the book follows Frankenstein’s nameless monster, abandoned and rejected by his creator, as he searches for acceptance and friendship. Meanwhile, Victor is convinced that he has unleashed a terrible evil upon the world and that he will have to destroy the monster before it destroys him.

Like Dracula, Frankenstein has become a part of popular culture, but most film versions of Frankenstein have very little in common with this book, so it’s still worth reading even if you think you already know the story. We probably all have an image in our mind of what Frankenstein’s monster looks like (green skin, bolt through the neck etc) but in the book, there are only a few descriptions of the monster’s physical appearance. We are told that he’s hideously ugly and much bigger than ordinary men, but he is also agile, intelligent and sensitive. The monster is also never given a name (his name is not Frankenstein, which is another common misconception) and Shelley refers to him most often as ‘the wretch’.

It’s the chapters that are told from the monster’s perspective that are the most interesting and also the most moving. Despite some of the horrific acts the monster commits, it would be difficult not to feel sympathy for him and anger towards Victor, who has created a living being and then abandoned it. The clear message of the book is that we need to think before we act and be prepared to accept responsibility for our actions. I think another thing Shelley is trying to show us is that rather than being born a monster we can become a monster because of the way we are treated by others. When we first meet Victor’s creature he is gentle and compassionate but after he is repeatedly rejected by society he begins to carry out violent, monstrous actions.

To the modern day reader there are some aspects of Frankenstein that are maybe not very satisfying or believable, such as the way the monster teaches himself to speak and to read. I would also have liked more details of the scientific methods Victor uses to create the monster and bring him to life, but I suppose that would have been beyond the scope of someone writing in the 1800s. As an early nineteenth century gothic novel, though, this is a true classic and I’m glad I took the time to re-read it.

Advertisements

17 thoughts on “Frankenstein by Mary Shelley

  1. kainzow06 says:

    Good review!
    In my opinion the moral underlying the story makes the beauty of ‘Frankenstein’,although at times it can get rather tedious to read.
    Victor’s constant use of the grandiloquent language to dramatize or beautify things can get quite boring at times.
    For me there are better classics.

    • Helen says:

      Thanks for commenting! I agree there are much better classics than this one, but as an early example of gothic fiction, this must be one of the most influential.

  2. Alex says:

    I have to admit, very shame-faced, that I have never read this. However, I am going to see the stage version within the next few weeks. Should I try and read the novel first, do you think?

  3. Lark says:

    I agree with you…the chapters told from the Monster’s point of view are some of my favorites, too…I always find myself rooting for him, and then feel bad when it never works out. This is not a book that I find myself wanting to reread a lot, but one I’m definitely glad to have read. Great post (as always)!

    • Helen says:

      I was impressed by it too. I only had very vague memories of my first read as a teenager and couldn’t remember how it was structured. I enjoyed it a lot more than I did the first time!

  4. Charlie says:

    I was never interested until I discovered what the themes were, because it’s so easy to get caught up in the monster-ness of it and just think it’s a horror. Very good review. You’ve made me want to put it on the definite list rather than maybe.

    • Helen says:

      I was surprised to find that, although it’s dark and gothic, it’s not really much of a horror story in the modern sense. It’s definitely very different from the idea of Frankenstein that has entered popular culture!

  5. An Experiment with the Well-Educated Mind says:

    I am just finishing up the final chapters of Frankenstein, and I am curious what others thought, too. I really am enjoying it, although at times it is far fetched, obviously. I wonder if maybe there is a possible message about the disastrous intentions of man trying to play God. Not sure, yet.

    • Helen says:

      Thanks for your comment. I thought there were a lot of things in the novel that weren’t adequately explained, but the story was so enjoyable I could almost overlook the negative points.

Please leave a comment. Thanks!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s