The Devil and King John by Philip Lindsay

The Devil and King John King John, who reigned from 1199 to 1216, has the unenviable reputation of being one of England’s ‘worst’ kings. Although historians are constantly revising their opinion and adding to what we know of John, people still tend to have a negative impression of him. His portrayal as the villain of Robin Hood must be at least partly responsible for that! This 1943 novel by the Australian author Philip Lindsay attempts to give a more balanced view of John, based around the idea that many of his actions were the result of an uncontrollable temper rather than simply cruelty.

The novel begins with John’s early years when he is known as Lackland because his father, Henry II, has divided his lands between his three eldest sons, leaving no substantial territories for John to inherit (despite John being his favourite son). On Henry’s death, John’s brother, Richard, takes the throne but spends much of his reign overseas fighting in the crusades and neglects the very important task of producing an heir. When Richard dies in 1199, John becomes king…but his own reign will be a very troubled one.

The Devil and King John is a straightforward fictional biography, taking us through the key moments of John’s life and career: his military defeats in northern France and subsequent attempts to win back lost lands; his dispute with Pope Innocent III and his excommunication; the death of his nephew, Arthur of Brittany, widely believed to have been murdered by John; and the rebellion by his barons which led to the signing of the Magna Carta at Runnymede in 1215. Lindsay’s portrayal of John throughout all of this is generally quite sympathetic, but not excessively so and I certainly can’t say that I came away from the book liking the character!

In the opening chapter of the novel we are told that the Angevins (the royal house to which John belongs) were descended from a witch and that “from the devil they had sprung and to the devil they would go”. After this, there are references to the devil on almost every page (at least, it seemed that way). I can understand that the author wanted to keep the theme going throughout the story, but constantly being told that “the devil is in John” or “John rides with the devil” is too much!

When I wrote about the other Lindsay novel I read earlier this year – Here Comes the King, the story of Catherine Howard and Thomas Culpeper – I complained that there was too much focus on the romance and I said I thought I’d enjoy one of his other books more. I did prefer this one and thought there was a good balance of romance, battles and politics. However, I was disappointed with the way in which the female characters were depicted in this book, particularly John’s second wife, Isabella of Angoulême, who had the potential to have been a great character. I also felt slightly uncomfortable reading about the relationship between John, in his thirties, and Isabella, aged thirteen, even though I know that an age difference of this size wasn’t unusual by the standards of medieval nobility.

John’s first wife, Hadwisa (also known as Isabella of Gloucester), is portrayed as a witch who encourages John to follow the ‘Old Religion’. Lindsay states in his author’s note that there is no historical evidence for this, but he wanted to find a way to connect John with witchcraft and to explain the king’s lifetime of conflict with the church over issues such as his reluctance to take communion.

Although there were some aspects of this book that I didn’t like very much, overall I thought The Devil and King John was an interesting read. If you’ve read any of Philip Lindsay’s novels – or any good books about King John – I’d love to hear about them!

Advertisements

13 thoughts on “The Devil and King John by Philip Lindsay”

  1. Many years ago I read Margaret Murray’s 1954 study, The Divine King in England which, to generalise, claimed that the medieval kings of England were all closet followers of a witch cult (the Old Religion) and that some were even ritually sacrificed at key calendrical moments. Certainly this theory was espoused by Robert Graves in The White Goddess and elsewhere and it sounds as if Lindsay’s novel may have been influenced by earlier hints in Murray’s The Witch-Cult in Western Europe (1921) and The God of the Witches (1931).

    So, to answer one of your questions, no — sorry! — I haven’t read any of his books. If you like medieval history though you might be interested in Paul Doherty’s Isabella and the Strange Death of Edward II (2003)which, though set later in the 13th century, still has lots of intrigue and death and even a fascinating queen, every bit as interesting and powerful as male monarchs! (My review is at http://wp.me/s2oNj1-edwardii)

    1. According to Wikipedia, Philip Lindsay was influenced by The Divine King in England, so you were right to make the connection. It’s an interesting theory, which I hadn’t come across until I read this book.
      The Paul Doherty book sounds good. I’ve read about Isabella a few times before and she was certainly a fascinating woman! Thanks for the suggestion.

  2. So that’s where the idea of witchcraft practicing English kings comes from. I’ve run across it here and there in novels, but find the idea unconvincing. I’d wondered if it had a source. But I don’t think the novelist could have been influenced by the Murray book unless he read it in manuscript, or someone’s dates are wrong. I also find the whole idea rather unlikely.

    Sorry I can’t recommend any novels that focus on John. I’ve read some where he’s a character but none I liked enough to remember titles for. There was a Pargeter that focused on his daughter who married the Welsh prince whose name I won’t try to spell before coffee. And a Pamela Bennett that focused on the Magna Carta, but that’s about it that stuck with me.

    1. Wikipedia probably got it wrong, then. It wouldn’t be the first time – I should know better than to treat it as a reliable source of information! I don’t find the witchcraft theory convincing either, although I did like the way Philip Lindsay incorporated it into his novel (apart from all the ‘devil’ references, which were just irritating).

      1. I’ve finally had a chance to check my copy of the novel and Lindsay does mention a few sources at the end, including The Witch-Cult in Western Europe and The God of the Witches, two books by Margaret Murray published in 1921 and 1931. He obviously couldn’t have read The Divine King in England, which was published in 1954 and expanded on the theories from her earlier books.

  3. Maybe another writer will take up the challenge and do justice to some of hte women in this story, create a broader narrative for them to inhabit on the page, which affords them more complexity. I can sympathize with your frustration on this score, although I haven’t read any of this author’s work myself. At least you did enjoy this one more than the previous one you read of his!

    1. Yes, Isabella of Angouleme and Isabella of Gloucester deserve better treatment. Actually, I’m sure there must already have been novels written about them, although I haven’t discovered any (apart from books where they appear as minor characters). I’ll have to investigate!

  4. I know King John doesn’t have much of a reputation, but I’ve always felt sorry for him, especially when he was left to take care of the country while his brother was in the Crusades and then in captivity. It must have been a thankless job. Too bad about the women, though.

Please leave a comment. Thanks!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s